The research, to its credit, is honest about its own limits. The National Association of Realtors states plainly that its annual Remodeling Impact Report covers all remodeling — not remodeling done to sell — and warns that local conditions may differ significantly from the national picture. Anyone presenting those figures as a Westport resale forecast is stretching the data well past what it can support.
There's a second problem with percentage ROI as a metric: it hides the denominator. Seventy percent of $40,000 returns $28,000. Fifty-five percent of $250,000 returns $137,500. The project with the lower percentage put dramatically more money back into your pocket and gave you a house you actually wanted to live in. Percentage ROI flatters small cosmetic work and quietly punishes the projects that change how a home functions.
Then there is the geography problem. Fairfield County is not one market. A shingled 1890s summer house on Sasco Hill in Fairfield, a walk-to-train Victorian in Saugatuck, a Harvard Five modernist on Oenoke Ridge in New Canaan, and an eighteenth-century center-chimney colonial on Redding Ridge do not respond to the same improvements, face the same regulatory constraints, or appeal to the same buyers. Any guide treating them as a unified number is describing an average that fits nobody.
Worth noting: Connecticut abolished county government in 1960. Fairfield County is a geographic reference, not a governing entity. Every rule that shapes your project — zoning, building code enforcement, health authority review, historic district designation, flood standards — is set by your town. That matters every time someone cites a "Fairfield County rule."
The same renovation dollar produces different returns depending on the house, the neighborhood, and the life being lived in it.